![]() talk about shake-rattle-and roll! I believe that the new versions of PrusaSlicer will also fill in this gap, don't know about Cura but I would guess they probably do too. Let me tell you, the first time you hear and see a printer trying to fill a 0.5mm gap in the perimeter with solid infill at 60mm/second. S3D on the other hand gives you the option of deciding if you want to fill this gap, either with solid infill or a single line. I also found that Slic3r would leave a gap in the perimeter if it could not fit in a complete perimeter. ![]() Because of that issue I shied away from Cura, I realize that they have probably fixed that problem, but once burned and all that. I found that Cura would sometimes miss putting support where it was needed, a 3D printer will NOT start printing in mid-air. While I was waiting for my first 3D printer kit to be delivered I played around with the available slicers using the simulator to evaluate how they preformed. The current version of PrusaSlicer will do ALMOST everything that S3D will do, and the price certainly is right.Ī number of years ago I found a g-code simulator for 3D printers. I use Simplif圓D for my slicer, I bought it a few years ago and at the time it was pretty much the Gold Standard for slicers. I agree with crec, PrusaSlicer is very good.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |